UFO/UAP Research
As a paranormal investigator I openly admit that the field of life after death research is in a state of complete shambles, however, the field of research regarding UFOs/UAPs is even worse, and is a battlefield of lies and deception, bordering on dangerous. UFO/UAP researchers have been pushing for the truth and disclosure for decades, and now feel they are finally seeing some progress. But are they, or are they just being fed a new deception pushing a new agenda?
For 70 years the government has done everything in their power to cover up these incidents and even declared that none of this is a threat to national security, until recently with the emergence of a new agenda, that all of a sudden, they do pose a threat.
Recently a new group of people have come forward, mostly ex-intelligence and defence personnel pushing the idea of a major global threat. Is it real or a new secret agenda?
Is it real or a new secret agenda?
Let’s look at one who has taken the lead on this charge. Luis Elizondo is a former U.S. Army Counterintelligence Special Agent and former employee of the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and the former director of the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP), a program associated with the Pentagon. Has been pushing the idea that UAPs are a major threat to national security. He has been linked to the leak of 3 videos showing UFOs namely the Gimble, Go Fast and Tic Tac recordings.
A comparison, when secrets are revealed the US government defends itself in every way possible, such was the case with Hacker Gary McKinnon, Hacker Julian Assange and whistle blower Edward Snowden. And yet when three top secret videos including radar and sensor recordings were stolen and leaked from not 1 but 2 nuclear carrier strike groups The USS Nimitz and the USS Theodore Roosevelt. There seemed to be no issue regarding the theft and leak, it seemed no one in authority cared. Even though the person who seemed responsible was buried under a mountain of secrecy documents including SF312 Non-disclosure agreement and SCI (sensitive compartmental information) non-disclosure agreement. No one in the pentagon even blinked.
So, What Happens When You Leak Classified Information?
So, what happens when you leak classified information? Intentionally disclosing classified information without authorization.
Individuals who hold security clearances are privileged to serve in positions of enormous trust and responsibility in the United States Government (USG). With this privilege, selected individuals are entrusted with safeguarding the nation’s most closely-held secrets that underpin our national security and are vital to the defense of the United States.
As a part of the process for granting access to classified information, the USG requires individuals to sign the Standard Form 312 (SF-312), Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement (NDA), or approved equivalent (hereafter referred to as NDA).
Executive Order (E.O.) 12968, Access to Classified Information, and E.O. 13526, Classified National Security Information, requires individuals to sign an approved NDA prior to gaining access to classified information.
E.O. 13526 also requires that individuals receive contemporaneous training on the proper safeguarding of classified information, and on the criminal, civil, and administrative sanctions that may be applied to any individual who fails to protect classified information from unauthorized disclosure.
Is whistle blowing the same as reporting unauthorized disclosure?
Making an unauthorized disclosure of classified information does not constitute whistleblowing nor is it an act of free speech. Like any mishandling of classified information, unlawful disclosures may subject you to potential criminal prosecution, civil penalties, and administrative disciplinary action.
All current, former, and retired DoD employees, contractors, and military service members (whether active or reserve) who have had access to DoD information, facilities, or who signed a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) must submit DoD information intended for public release to the appropriate office for review.
Reminder: Protection of DoD information is a lifelong responsibility. The responsibility does not end with an individual’s association with the Department of Defense. Unauthorized disclosure of classified information (whether in a printed article, manuscript or book, on a blog, on a public website or provided to the media), even when it appears in the public domain, does not automatically result in the declassification of the information. The information remains classified and must be protected until the U.S. government official with original classification authority declassifies the information.
A couple of good examples:
- Matt Bissonnette had signed non-disclosure agreements during his service as a SEAL, and he took part in a number of highly secret operations including the bin Laden raid.
- Ex-SEAL Member Who Wrote Book on Bin Laden Raid Forfeits $6.8 Million.
- Matt Bissonnette, who wrote “No Easy Day” under the pseudonym Mark Owen, will give the US government all profits and royalties from the book or movie rights.
- Also; Tom Clancy was questioned by the FBI after ‘Hunt for Red October’ was released because of the technical details within the book were eerily close to classified info at the time.
So, somehow, they want us to believe that a group of high-ranking Navy pilots simply stole highly classified fighter jet camera video off of a nuclear aircraft carrier strike group and whisked it away to the news papers, not once but several times and no one ever faced criminal charges. Not only that, but all involved became highly recognized celebrities who have and continue to appear on countless documentaries. Matter of fact, there are so many US military and intelligence staff becoming unhindered celebrities talking about Pentagon UAP secrets and the mystery of UFOs shutting down nuclear weapons. All this is quite remarkable considering even in their own words they clearly state implications to national security.
Then there is this incident that really builds a mystery.
Robert Salas in 1967 is a missile launch officer at Malmstrom AF Base, Montana, in control of 10 nuclear missiles.
He reports that security has reported an orange flying disc around and over the base, security personnel are frightened.
Salas states that he believes the base is under attack, and observes the 10 warheads he is in charge of switch off by themselves, moving their status to no go, or unable to launch as well as incursion light indicators showing security breach within the facilities. I found it remarkable that with all the security protocols available he didn’t send backup security to assist the front gate staff nor did he request either helicopter gun ship or a fighter interceptor to respond. What I do find interesting is he is listed on IMDB, and according to the film data base he has appeared in no fewer than 29 film documentaries.
Remember what president Eisenhower warned about just before he left the White House in 1961. “In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.”
So, ask your self does any of this disclosure make sense? Or are you just buying into a new type of deception?
